Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
C-Dawg

Yet Another Reason to Love Fox News...

Recommended Posts

Stewart is a comedic act and his entire audience realizes it.  Hannity claims to be a journalist and his entire audience believes it.  Comparing the two is like comparing a slapstick movie and one that is so bad it is unintentionally funny

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stewart is very mean spirited.  pointing at and mocking half the population to roaring liberal support and being a comedian are different things.  just because its funny doesn't mean it's unbiased or less partisan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^good lord, but Limbaugh is not?? O'Reilly?? I use them as examples because they're commentary is equally laughable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stewart is a comedic act and his entire audience realizes it. 

 

That is so not true!  Plenty of Gen X folks watch him exclusively to "get their news" and think they are staying informed by doing it.  I'd love to see a little data cross referencing the Daily Show viewers & what other news programs they also watch regularly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stewart is very mean spirited.  pointing at and mocking half the population to roaring liberal support and being a comedian are different things.  just because its funny doesn't mean it's unbiased or less partisan.

 

He really doesn't do that.  He mocks the media, not just Fox News, and he mocks politicians of all stripes.  Yeah, Daily Show is basically liberal, but the fact that you guys are trying to compare his Comedy Central mock news program to "real" news programs on Fox News would provide Stewart with some good fodder in and of itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In retrospect, starting a thread like this was not the most mature decision. It was just asking for a can of worms to be opened...

 

Luckily, I no longer work in the news media, so my anger has turned into sadness and empathy for my friends still in the business. From what I'm hearing from old colleagues now in Columbus, Chicago, New York, Boston, DC, and many other markets, things today are markedly worse than just a few years ago. A lot of important stories just aren't being covered anymore. Investigative units have been slashed to the bone. Foreign correspondence? Ha! It's tougher than ever for a journalist who wants to cover hard news. My heart goes out to the men and women still fighting the battle. There are still a lot of good people in the industry (even Fox), but the numbers are so unrealistically low, that there just isn't the manpower to have the type of in-depth coverage we enjoyed in the past in America.

 

The kids today want top 10 click bait and trolling garbage. I'd rather kids watch Fox News than read Buzzfeed or Thought Catalog. Buzzfeed is a big step down from even Fox News. This click-bait social media crap is dominating young audience and could spell the death of real news as we know it. I fear we've headed to a much worse world filled with willful ignorance. While biased, mainstream news outlets at least keep their viewers aware of current events and basic stuff like their local mayors, city councilmen, representatives, etc.

 

Nowadays, I am completely shocked by the number of college grads who can't even name the mayor of their city or their representatives in Congress. Yes, things have gotten that bad, and I think at least part of it is due to them not looking at hard news sites. Even Fox News is better than nothing. :|

 

This is really dangerous stuff in any democratic nation. It is possible for leaders to get away with unprecedented levels of corruption if voters don't pay attention to what is going on in their city, county, state, and nation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is really dangerous stuff in any democratic nation. It is possible for leaders to get away with unprecedented levels of corruption if voters don't pay attention to what is going on in their city, county, state, and nation.

 

That's kind of the point.  Well, not exactly.  It's possible for the government to get away with a lot of power aggrandizement, which can manifest itself as corruption, overreach, violation of basic civil liberties, etc.

 

Just look at the latest media flurry about kids getting in trouble for refusing to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.  My God, that's been settled Constitutional law for over seventy years, and districts still seem to think they can get away with it.  My understanding is (at least) Bedford does it too.

 

The roots of this are in education.  Fox and the websites are reacting to a trend, not driving it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

news-sources-fdu.jpg

 

According to this article those who watch Fox News for almost all of their information are less informed about both domestic issues and international issues than those who have no news exposure at all.

 

The Daily Show viewers are second best informed on global issues (after NPR), and third best informed on domestic issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stewart is a comedic act and his entire audience realizes it. 

 

That is so not true!  Plenty of Gen X folks watch him exclusively to "get their news" and think they are staying informed by doing it.  I'd love to see a little data cross referencing the Daily Show viewers & what other news programs they also watch regularly

 

I hear this meme a lot from conservatives.  First of all, nobody watches the Daily Show "exclusively to get their news."  You might happen to get some news in the process, but nobody watches it exclusively for that purpose.  To the extent they don't watch other cable news programs, are you honestly surprised?  Most young people, whether liberal or conservative, don't watch cable news.  Fox News's audience, for instance, is dominated by the elderly.  I read somewhere that more than half of its viewers are over 68 years old.  Certainly not to the same degree, but I'm sure CNN and MSNBC also have older than average demographics in their viewing audience.

 

Another thing you are not considering is that liberals disproportionately favor 'getting their news' through the print media.  That stat has probably significantly diminished to the extent you consider all of these far-right wing websites (which are increasingly dominating any google search) to be 'print media'.  But, point being, just because you don't watch cable news doesn't mean you don't get your news.  I personally don't watch much cable news (or any other TV news) if there is not a story I am interested in.  I still get my news.

 

And, BTW, for those who claim that Stewart is not an equal opportunity satirist, check out his skewering of Harry Reid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In retrospect, starting a thread like this was not the most mature decision. It was just asking for a can of worms to be opened...

 

Luckily, I no longer work in the news media, so my anger has turned into sadness and empathy for my friends still in the business. From what I'm hearing from old colleagues now in Columbus, Chicago, New York, Boston, DC, and many other markets, things today are markedly worse than just a few years ago. A lot of important stories just aren't being covered anymore. Investigative units have been slashed to the bone. Foreign correspondence? Ha! It's tougher than ever for a journalist who wants to cover hard news. My heart goes out to the men and women still fighting the battle. There are still a lot of good people in the industry (even Fox), but the numbers are so unrealistically low, that there just isn't the manpower to have the type of in-depth coverage we enjoyed in the past in America.

 

The kids today want top 10 click bait and trolling garbage. I'd rather kids watch Fox News than read Buzzfeed or Thought Catalog. Buzzfeed is a big step down from even Fox News. This click-bait social media crap is dominating young audience and could spell the death of real news as we know it. I fear we've headed to a much worse world filled with willful ignorance. While biased, mainstream news outlets at least keep their viewers aware of current events and basic stuff like their local mayors, city councilmen, representatives, etc.

 

Nowadays, I am completely shocked by the number of college grads who can't even name the mayor of their city or their representatives in Congress. Yes, things have gotten that bad, and I think at least part of it is due to them not looking at hard news sites. Even Fox News is better than nothing. :|

 

This is really dangerous stuff in any democratic nation. It is possible for leaders to get away with unprecedented levels of corruption if voters don't pay attention to what is going on in their city, county, state, and nation.

 

Have you seen Vice?  Vice gives me hope that there is still a place for true journalism.  They've announced in the coming year a ton of new partnerships and other platforms for their content to live.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you seen Vice?  Vice gives me hope that there is still a place for true journalism.  They've announced in the coming year a ton of new partnerships and other platforms for their content to live.

 

I've seen some very strange documentaries from these folks. Just proves the world is....strange.

 

I'd prefer to get my news from sources without political affiliation. Say that would narrow down sources to 2 percent ha ha. It's easier to get info from the fringe "right" and "left" and just sort it all out yourself while keeping in mind their agenda.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stewart is a comedic act and his entire audience realizes it. 

 

That is so not true!  Plenty of Gen X folks watch him exclusively to "get their news" and think they are staying informed by doing it.  I'd love to see a little data cross referencing the Daily Show viewers & what other news programs they also watch regularly

 

I hear this meme a lot from conservatives.  First of all, nobody watches the Daily Show "exclusively to get their news."  You might happen to get some news in the process, but nobody watches it exclusively for that purpose.  To the extent they don't watch other cable news programs, are you honestly surprised?  Most young people, whether liberal or conservative, don't watch cable news.  Fox News's audience, for instance, is dominated by the elderly.  I read somewhere that more than half of its viewers are over 68 years old.  Certainly not to the same degree, but I'm sure CNN and MSNBC also have older than average demographics in their viewing audience.

 

Another thing you are not considering is that liberals disproportionately favor 'getting their news' through the print media.  That stat has probably significantly diminished to the extent you consider all of these far-right wing websites (which are increasingly dominating any google search) to be 'print media'.  But, point being, just because you don't watch cable news doesn't mean you don't get your news.  I personally don't watch much cable news (or any other TV news) if there is not a story I am interested in.  I still get my news.

 

And, BTW, for those who claim that Stewart is not an equal opportunity satirist, check out his skewering of Harry Reid

 

He tore Coakley to shreds when Scott Brown beat her.  But he sure seems to lean left, most of the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is a Libertarian, for the most part.  He might not fit the definition of a "Libertarian" as that term has been hijacked as denoting a political party as opposed to a political/societal ideology.  He's not the more singularly focused anti-tax Libertarian.  But like a lot of political satirists, Bill Maher included, he is a 'what I put up my arse or in my mouth is my own da&& business' Libertarian.

 

As for him disproportionately skewering Fox News, well..... as a comedian, you have to work with the material that is handed to you and Fox News gives him a daily treasure trove

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He tore Coakley to shreds when Scott Brown beat her.  But he sure seems to lean left, most of the time.

 

Facts lean left. So does humor, apparently. Whereas grouchiness tends to lean right, especially the curmudgeonly variety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He tore Coakley to shreds when Scott Brown beat her.  But he sure seems to lean left, most of the time.

 

Facts lean left. So does humor, apparently. Whereas grouchiness tends to lean right, especially the curmudgeonly variety.

 

There may have been some truth to the humor part once.  Not since "political correctness" emerged. 

 

Indeed, un-PC humor and "disaster jokes" have replaced dirty jokes where shock value is concerned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you seen Vice?  Vice gives me hope that there is still a place for true journalism.  They've announced in the coming year a ton of new partnerships and other platforms for their content to live.

 

I've seen some very strange documentaries from these folks. Just proves the world is....strange.

 

I'd prefer to get my news from sources without political affiliation. Say that would narrow down sources to 2 percent ha ha. It's easier to get info from the fringe "right" and "left" and just sort it all out yourself while keeping in mind their agenda.

 

Vice certainly seems to have a liberal lean to it and you can see it come through quite plainly in their domestic stories, especially those on pot.  Their international pieces, however, are simply fantastic.  Especially the pieces on foreign conflicts (Ukraine, North Korea, Syria, etc.).

 

I tend to binge watch Vice because the short, information packed stories make it extremely easy to watch.  I also love that they're on HBO so that they can remain relatively uncensored.  I always feel like I'm being treated like a child when I watch sensitive stories network or basic cable TV.  I'd love to see them dive into more detail on a few of their stories (Kurds in Syria, Afghanistan reconstruction, anything North Korea).  Hopefully as they grow as a media group they'll be able to dive a little deeper into some of the more well received stories they've done.

 

In the future documentaries might be the last refuge of true investigative journalism.  Although, Vice might be more appropriately categorized as a newsmagazine the likes of Dateline and 60 Minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He tore Coakley to shreds when Scott Brown beat her.  But he sure seems to lean left, most of the time.

 

Facts lean left. So does humor, apparently. Whereas grouchiness tends to lean right, especially the curmudgeonly variety.

 

Do facts lean left or do liers lean right?  Lately, I think I'd go with the latter.  And the proliferation of far right (and to a lesser extent left) wing websites has allowed many of the lies to gain traction and stick around far longer than they probably would have in the past.  I mean, the birther movement.  Honestly.  According the Gallup in April 2011, 44% of the population was either unsure or didn't believe President Obama was born in the United States.  These fringe websites provide what looks like evidence to many people, but in reality they are just baseless accusations and attempts to correlate unrelated facts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^Vice announced a series of new programs that are going to be accessible via YouTube, streaming web, apps, etc.  Some of them look incredible.  One in particular takes a look at the various Black Markets that exist across the world, Heroin trade in Afghanistan, sex slavery in Far East, and guns in Detroit, to name but a few.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He tore Coakley to shreds when Scott Brown beat her.  But he sure seems to lean left, most of the time.

 

Facts lean left. So does humor, apparently. Whereas grouchiness tends to lean right, especially the curmudgeonly variety.

 

There may have been some truth to the humor part once.  Not since "political correctness" emerged. 

 

Indeed, un-PC humor and "disaster jokes" have replaced dirty jokes where shock value is concerned.

 

It is really hard to explain and maybe it just does come down to a "I know it when I see it" test, but there is a difference between what might be called poking fun "un-PC" humor and flat out mean-spirited "un-PC" humor.  Throwing a banana at a black person might be funny to some and is definitely not PC, but it is also done in a very mean-spirited way and rightfully draws scorn.  Then there is the type of non-PC humor you see on a show like Family Guy, written and created by Seth McFarlane, who undoubtedly leans left.  Seth McFarlane makes the most offensive and racist jokes you could possibly imagine, yet you don't see his shows getting cancelled.  That's because he does it in a poking fun kind of way, and the times when it is not done in that fashion it really is the equivalent of pulling the bully's pants down in front of all the other kids on the playground...... like what Stewart does to Fox News every night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please.  Don Rickles has made a 40+ year career in comedy by making racist jokes.  He even made a racist joke about Obama that was really harsh

 

Back on topic, I think the point is that journalistic integrity has been replaced by the need to generate ratings above all else.  Left, right and all slivers in between seem to have carved out their niche of viewers and are content in generating programming, with hosts, guests & discussion that will keep them tuning in.  It's like they can't risk alienating a single viewer.

 

It's puzzling/troubling how both networks can cover a topic like Benghazi/Healthcare Reform/Koch Brothers, etc and present two TOTALLY opposite viewpoints.  At this point, neither has any credibility.  Which disappoints me so much that CNN hasn't been able to capitalize on the middle ground with quality news programming

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Daniel Tosh is mean-spirited and offensive. I agree he gets away with a ton of stuff because his target audience is an echo chamber...that rape joke wasn't funny and was pretty sickening:

 

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/07/11/why-daniel-tosh-s-rape-joke-at-the-laugh-factory-wasn-t-funny.html

 

He has no moral compass and exploits the less influential. That's his style of comedy and I've never liked that stuff. The best comedy doesn't come from the elites, it comes from guys with grit (Richard Pryor, etc.). Daniel Tosh reminds me of some of the rich white dudes in San Francisco who make fun of homeless black men and Vietnam vets in the Tenderloin. There is absolutely nothing funny about laughing at the less fortunate and less powerful in this world. Guys who exploit this type of comedy think they're being clever, but they're not. Daniel Tosh reminds me of Greg Gopman- socially liberal, but intolerant and filled with hate. There are sadly a good number of these types in California, and they don't represent the values this state is supposed to espouse:

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/11/angelhack-san-francisco_n_4428104.html

http://valleywag.gawker.com/homeless-hater-greg-gopman-sued-for-abusing-funds-and-t-1530897282

 

Tosh is a douche and bully, but since he has a soft, non-threatening "nice guy" voice and is a, tall, skinny white dude, he can get away with a lot. America still largely gives a pass to those kinds of people. It's not right, but it explains how he can be more exploitative than others. I think if a black man said even half the stuff that Daniel Tosh says (especially the rape jokes), he'd be railroaded out of town. We still live in a society of double-standards. "Oh, Daniel Tosh looks like such a frat boy next door and is so clean-cut. He could never be a racist, sexist, homophobic monster." Well, there is some evidence that he is, and it goes beyond being "funny." He just seems like a mean person. With comedy, it can be tough to draw that line, but I think Tosh has long been on the wrong side of that line.

 

Louis CK gets away with a lot because, well, he's damn funny. :wink: As a bald, frumpy, middle-aged man in America, he is getting no breaks from anybody. He captures middle-age rage better than other comedians right now. His comedy comes from the heart and he is not the type of guy anybody looks up to and says, "I hope I age like that." He is fully self-aware and tapped into the masses of people America has effectively thrown to the wolves. The real genius is that anybody can find some truth in his work even if it doesn't directly relate to them. He's good at observation and he doesn't have the ego of guys like Tosh.

 

Colbert gets away with a lot too because he is hilarious! It's classic satire, which I've always found to be the best comedy.

 

I guess what I'm saying is there is a big difference between stuff like Daniel Tosh and Fox News compared to Louis CK, Stephen Colbert, or Jon Stewart. Good comedy has always been political (Chappelle's Show brought out all sorts of issues in this country), and there is a way to do it without being a douchebag. You don't have to be politically correct (that stuff is wholly lame). You just have to hit the right targets and be fair.

 

But I do think there is a tendency for liberals to overlook and forgive their own. Racism, classism, and sexism know no political boundaries. There are plenty of racist and classist liberals in places like California and New York. They donate to the Democratic Party, but they're far from "progressive" or "tolerant." In fact, the most racist and classist stuff I've heard in my life has come from some so-called liberals in San Francisco. I don't hear Republican friends in Pacific Heights or Orange County say this stuff (SF and OC GOP tend to be pretty mellow). It's usually a self-identified Democrat...in these cases, the liberalism is all an act! It's to trick people and get in bed with the political power brokers in San Francisco and Los Angeles. There are good people and bad people in both parties. I wouldn't be surprised if Tosh is a card-carrying member of the Democratic Party...people assume he's a Republican since a lot of his audience are frat guys in middle America, but I have doubts. Conversely, I know lots of elite Democrats who watch Fox News and CNBC because it speaks to them as "makers."

 

While we are dealing with political stereotypes in this thread, keep in mind there are a lot of terrible people on both sides of the political spectrum. That's how this nation has gotten so ugly and "us versus them." Both Republicans and Democrats want it this way. They are two sides of the same elitist coin. It keeps third parties and independents out...we've got a lot of terrible leadership that is getting a pass in our slow pitch news media. Shame on politicians who prey on this and shame on media outlets who let this happen. And also, shame on the apathetic people who aren't even paying attention to what is going on around them. I'm amazed how few people vote on ballot issues. That stuff immediately and directly has an effect on your life. These aren't laws and regulations passed in far away places. They're right down the street...

 

And with the proliferation of Buzzfeed type of sites, it's only going to get worse. I do love the video journalism that Vice is doing (reminds me a lot of old school 60 Minutes), but I think it's obvious it can never replace solid local and national newsrooms. Still, it's a lot better than any of the other social-sharing blog news out there today...

 

Vice has stepped up big since its days as a Brooklyn hipster ranking site. I agree it's a small glimmer of hope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Left, right and all slivers in between seem to have carved out their niche of viewers and are content in generating programming, with hosts, guests & discussion that will keep them tuning in.  It's like they can't risk alienating a single viewer.

 

It's puzzling/troubling how both networks can cover a topic like Benghazi/Healthcare Reform/Koch Brothers, etc and present two TOTALLY opposite viewpoints.  At this point, neither has any credibility.

 

Second this. Well said.

 

It's all about the niche focus now. That's how you get social media shares. Buzzfeed perfected this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He tore Coakley to shreds when Scott Brown beat her.  But he sure seems to lean left, most of the time.

 

Facts lean left. So does humor, apparently. Whereas grouchiness tends to lean right, especially the curmudgeonly variety.

 

Do facts lean left or do liers lean right?  Lately, I think I'd go with the latter.  And the proliferation of far right (and to a lesser extent left) wing websites has allowed many of the lies to gain traction and stick around far longer than they probably would have in the past.  I mean, the birther movement.  Honestly.  According the Gallup in April 2011, 44% of the population was either unsure or didn't believe President Obama was born in the United States.  These fringe websites provide what looks like evidence to many people, but in reality they are just baseless accusations and attempts to correlate unrelated facts.

 

The doubts about Obama's birthplace are his own fault.  Personally, I believe he was born in Hawaii, but it seems pretty clear that when it's been to his benefit to have people think he was born in Kenya or was actually Indonesian, he's been willing to let them. 

 

As for the websites, two major "scoops" set the stage for that.  The first, the Lewinsky affair, was simply a case of the media not talking about something most of them at least knew was there.  The second, the Sixty Minutes memos, happened almost in real time.  As these stories benefited the right, use of the 'net became more popular there.  Plus, the original computer subculture leaned libertarian  or even minanarchist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But I do think there is a tendency for liberals to overlook and forgive their own. Racism, classism, and sexism know no political boundaries. There are plenty of racist and classist liberals in places like California and New York. They donate to the Democratic Party, but they're far from "progressive" or "tolerant." In fact, the most racist and classist stuff I've heard in my life has come from some so-called liberals in San Francisco. I don't hear Republican friends in Pacific Heights or Orange County say this stuff (SF and OC GOP tend to be pretty mellow). It's usually a self-identified Democrat...in these cases, the liberalism is all an act! It's to trick people and get in bed with the political power brokers in San Francisco and Los Angeles. There are good people and bad people in both parties. I wouldn't be surprised if Tosh is a card-carrying member of the Democratic Party...people assume he's a Republican since a lot of his audience are frat guys in middle America, but I have doubts. Conversely, I know lots of elite Democrats who watch Fox News and CNBC because it speaks to them as "makers."

 

While we are dealing with political stereotypes in this thread, keep in mind there are a lot of terrible people on both sides of the political spectrum. That's how this nation has gotten so ugly and "us versus them." Both Republicans and Democrats want it this way. They are two sides of the same elitist coin. It keeps third parties and independents out...we've got a lot of terrible leadership that is getting a pass in our slow pitch news media. Shame on politicians who prey on this and shame on media outlets who let this happen. And also, shame on the apathetic people who aren't even paying attention to what is going on around them. I'm amazed how few people vote on ballot issues. That stuff immediately and directly has an effect on your life. These aren't laws and regulations passed in far away places. They're right down the street...

 

It seems like black comedians can get away with a lot as long as no one follows through their logic.  Chris Rock's famous routine about the two different types of black people makes Bill Cosby sound like Al Sharpton.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The doubts about Obama's birthplace are his own fault.  Personally, I believe he was born in Hawaii, but it seems pretty clear that when it's been to his benefit to have people think he was born in Kenya or was actually Indonesian, he's been willing to let them. 

 

Ah yes..... the conspiracy within the conspiracy.  A conspiracy to justify the conspiracy!  Sorry, but to blame others for your own insanity is insane.  At least that's what I believe.... personally.  Next thing you know, Ted Cruz and his cohorts are going to be blaming the Dems for shutting down the government.  Oh wait.... ;) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's puzzling/troubling how both networks can cover a topic like Benghazi/Healthcare Reform/Koch Brothers, etc and present two TOTALLY opposite viewpoints.  At this point, neither has any credibility.  Which disappoints me so much that CNN hasn't been able to capitalize on the middle ground with quality news programming

 

It would take both a network willing to sacrifice ratings and a journalist (or more than one) willing to sacrifice earnings to make that happen.  Conservative PBS anchor (now there's a phrase that may never be heard again) William F. Buckley's Firing Line show was arguably the best public affairs show of its day (and it had a long day), but the production values were very spartan and modern Fox News conservative primetime anchors (Hannity, O'Reilly) make exponentially more than Buckley ever did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the stats provided in the link below, "Fox News ran 1,098 segments on Benghazi between the attack on Sept. 11, 2012, and the formation of the select committee on May 2, 2014."  This coverage has, IMNSHO, been the impetus to congressional Republicans spending millions upon millions of dollars investigating the incident looking for that lost needle in the haystack.  Now that the GOP-led house intelligence committee has released its report finding no evidence of a cover-up by the White House, Fox passes along that information in a very short segment lasting less than 30 seconds.  Fair and balanced, folks.

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-22/why-you-shouldnt-hold-your-breath-about-benghazi-fading

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ugh.

 

I said this before on both the Obama administration thread and at least one other: If Benghazi is the worst thing that the Republicans can hang on Clinton, then Clinton will be the next president.  Period.  It is an absolute non-event and the oxygen wasted on it sucks limited attention span away from the real scandals that deserve to be run to the ground, including the IRS targeting and NSA warrantless wiretapping.  The only reason they're focused on Benghazi at all is because it happened on Hillary's watch and they're desperate for ammunition to use against her (and even there, I have to think they're looking in the wrong places ... I'm sure Clinton has dirt in her closet, but Benghazi isn't it).  If the SoS at the time of the attack had been someone without presidential ambitions, we'd have basically heard the last of it in 2012, or at least there wouldn't be all these select committees and other nonsense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is making the rounds on Facecrook. There's a blond joke, or worse, an Aryan joke in here somewhere....

 

10348385_830433380353384_2725993668222233112_n.jpg?oh=443c5ae630017fdd87211c2f71f2c32d&oe=550605A3


"Nearly every problem that we have in the USA -- unaffordable health care, prison overpopulation, hyper militarization, climate change, racism, gun violence, poverty, poor education, urban sprawl and others -- cannot be positively addressed because bribery and conflicts of interest are legal under campaign finance laws which protect the uber-wealthy and the narrow self-interests who grossly benefit from our afflictions."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"When the news breaks, we fix it." -- Fox

 

Baltimore FOX News Affiliate Caught Faking "Kill a Cop" Protest Chant. http://t.co/0qAsD7LMwg


"Nearly every problem that we have in the USA -- unaffordable health care, prison overpopulation, hyper militarization, climate change, racism, gun violence, poverty, poor education, urban sprawl and others -- cannot be positively addressed because bribery and conflicts of interest are legal under campaign finance laws which protect the uber-wealthy and the narrow self-interests who grossly benefit from our afflictions."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right-Wing Media Hide Obama And De Blasio Statements To Blame Them For Violence Against Police http://mediamatters.org/research/2014/12/21/right-wing-media-hide-obama-and-de-blasio-state/201974


"Nearly every problem that we have in the USA -- unaffordable health care, prison overpopulation, hyper militarization, climate change, racism, gun violence, poverty, poor education, urban sprawl and others -- cannot be positively addressed because bribery and conflicts of interest are legal under campaign finance laws which protect the uber-wealthy and the narrow self-interests who grossly benefit from our afflictions."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^Ha, I started watching some of their coverage out of perverse curiosity, saw that bit, and had to switch it off quickly. What a joke. I'm sure it's not unique to Fox News, but almost anyone with a title of "terrorism expert" or something similar is probably a dimwit.

 

On that same topic, the whole Birmingham thing was kind of funny, especially all the #foxnewsfacts jokes that came after: http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/fox-news-said-non-muslims-dont-visit-birmingham-and-created

It's not every day the British PM goes out of his way to single out a cable news "expert" as being a complete idiot: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11340399/David-Cameron-US-terror-expert-Steve-Emerson-is-a-complete-idiot.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The mayor of Paris is threatening to sue Fox News. @FeargusOSull writes about why that isn't crazy http://t.co/MFrhnomFx6


"Nearly every problem that we have in the USA -- unaffordable health care, prison overpopulation, hyper militarization, climate change, racism, gun violence, poverty, poor education, urban sprawl and others -- cannot be positively addressed because bribery and conflicts of interest are legal under campaign finance laws which protect the uber-wealthy and the narrow self-interests who grossly benefit from our afflictions."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This network is on a roll lately.....

 

1. Alter the 'top 10' GOP candidates in a Quinnipiac poll by eliminating Rand Paul

 

2. Spend less than 1 1/2 minutes on the Duggar admission of molesting young girls

 

3. Gloss over the indictment of former GOP House Speaker Dennis Haskert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignoring or downplaying the Hastert indictment for the moment may be wise.  When a Democratic prosecutor indicts a Republican figure, there ought to be a certain skepticism, particularly considering the absolute collapse (to the point where the prosecutor is possibly facing sanctions) of the years-long prosecutorial witch hunt against Scott Walker in Wisconsin.

 

I agree about the others, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This network is on a roll lately.....

 

1. Alter the 'top 10' GOP candidates in a Quinnipiac poll by eliminating Rand Paul

 

2. Spend less than 1 1/2 minutes on the Duggar admission of molesting young girls

 

3. Gloss over the indictment of former GOP House Speaker Dennis Haskert

 

I would expect nothing else from that propaganda mill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This network is on a roll lately.....

 

2. Spend less than 1 1/2 minutes on the Duggar admission of molesting young girls

 

I've been out of the news cycle for a few days.  What's this got to do with Fox news or the political world?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^Duggar was (resigned a few days ago) the executive head of the Family Research Council's political wing.  The FRC is an anti-gay group which is regularly featured on Fox News and is, of course, highly supportive of Republican candidates.

 

So much for traditional family values.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem to watch a lot of fox news for someone who hates fox news.

 

What do you consider 'a lot'?  I try my best to diversify, but can't say I 'watch' a lot of news period.  I get most of my news from the print media, which is where I got 2/3 of the information for that post.  The other third was from another thread on this site. 

 

Nice try though :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...