Jump to content
buildingcincinnati

Columbus: Harrison West / Dennison Place Developments and News

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, DTCL11 said:

What's particularly funny about the shadow casting argument is the biggest area affected by the new shadow will be the rest of the same building, a couple properties behind and the freaking Kroger. Will somebody please consider the effect on Kroger after 3.30 pm in the summer?! What will they do with less sun?! Nooooooo

 

Sounds amazing. I hate roasting atop asphalt parking lots in the middle of summer.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DTCL11 said:

We got our so you can't have yours. Screw them all. I'm hopeful but I would probably still bet money on a rejection and watch the developer pull put. I honestly dont think the uncommon pt II was a serious proposal but a scare tactic. If they do follow through with the Uncommon pt II version the community will get exactly what it deserves to the detriment of the neighborhood. 

 

What's particularly funny about the shadow casting argument is the biggest area affected by the new shadow will be the rest of the same building, a couple properties behind and the freaking Kroger. Will somebody please consider the effect on Kroger after 3.30 pm in the summer?! What will they do with less sun?! Nooooooo

 

 

Have their electric bill go down by thousands of dollars a month from April to October and massively reduce their carbon footprint, that's what.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A little late to this but to me there shouldn't be too many NIMBYs in this area like the Kaufman project.  This is also actually on High Street versus that project which was not.  This is a high renter area outside of condos on Clark, but those don't have a yard as is, so I'm not sure why they would complain.  In general 3 of 4 sides are either commercial or rentals, so I doubt the NIMBYs win this fight, especially with the changes to the on-street design.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, very interesting. From the Harrison West Society facebook page:

 

Quote

Neil Ave Giant Eagle Plaza Development: A much anticipated preview of the potential redevelopment of the Giant Eagle plaza on Neil Avenue is finally here! CASTO Realty Group will be attending the next Harrison West Society meeting on Wednesday, 2/19, at 7 pm in the Harrison Park Clubhouse to provide details on the project and gather input from the neighbors. We encourage all neighbors to attend, learn more about this potentially major development in Harrison West, and provide feedback.

 

image.png.aa3c2db5df56b40f857f6d25c482a4fc.png

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Please. So much potential. 

 

And frankly, with the retirement homes, I'm not sure we shouldn't see a tower component toward the southwest part of this property. One certainly cannot argue a tower would be inappropriate with 3 12(ish) story buildings within a stone's throw. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Pablo said:

^I don't think the NIMBY's would allow a tower. What about the sun?!?

 

Don't make me pull out the sun diagrams! 😉

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, there's no way a tower goes in there, even if one is proposed.  I would expect something more along the lines of a 3-5 story, largely-residential project with maybe corner spot for retail.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't get me wrong, I'm not *expecting* a tower. And allow me to clarify with it being a mid-rise tower not to exceed the Westminster-Thurber towers.  I'm sure CASTO will come up with something very formulaic and copy paste. It's Just that there should be one included. The area of the CVS seems the most reasonable location given the proximity to the others and the lack of adjacent single family homes.

Screenshot_20200211-102002_Maps.jpg

Edited by DTCL11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been waiting for years for this. I lived across the street from this plaza for about 4 years and wanted it redeveloped. I hope they don't disappoint.

 

This is such a great opportunity for more density. I really hope they have something a little higher than 3 to 5 stories planned. It's right on a frequent bus route, too. C'mooon!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news, and a long time coming! I wish there were some way to repair the street grid behind this, which is cut off all the way to 1st. At least Buttles should go through.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The apartment building closest to 315 at Founders Park is up to four floors on the elevator shafts. I was southbound on 315, but it appeared like this building is going to be right on top of the freeway, and a couple floors above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DTCL11 said:

Don't get me wrong, I'm not *expecting* a tower. And allow me to clarify with it being a mid-rise tower not to exceed the Westminster-Thurber towers.  I'm sure CASTO will come up with something very formulaic and copy paste. It's Just that there should be one included. The area of the CVS seems the most reasonable location given the proximity to the others and the lack of adjacent single family homes.

Screenshot_20200211-102002_Maps.jpg

 

For sure, there is definitely room for one there.  It's a large site that could allow a tower to sit back from Neil and the single-family homes.  I just don't think it'll happen.  If anything, I'm surprised that WT didn't try to buy this site for potential expansion.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, aderwent said:

The apartment building closest to 315 at Founders Park is up to four floors on the elevator shafts. I was southbound on 315, but it appeared like this building is going to be right on top of the freeway, and a couple floors above.

 

Yeah, I really don't like the development, but I thought it being that close to 315 was kind of cool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick project update for King & High

I was able to make it to the commission meeting last month, was hoping some articles would come out about it but since not... I wanted to fill you all in. 

 

Short answer, it's still a no from UARB. 

 

Long answer, here's a bullet point rundown...

 

- Portion will be "co-living" to reduce rent. Shared common spaces with private rooms, similar to pieces of Gravity II. 

- When asked, CDG said project will not cast shadows on any existing properties that the current buildings don't already.

- UARB said height variance is "major ask" and they cant support it, CDG said the tallest portion now only covers less than a quarter of total project and rest falls under 72' zoned height.

- UARB asked CDG to consider reducing project scope, says height overwhelms existing historic properties.

- UARB asked why there is a High St curb cut, CDG said city traffic and planning requested this, UARB asked CDG do full traffic study because they don't want to see curb cuts on High. 

- UARB asked what will become of old service station, CDG says it will be partially restored for garage entrance but not wholly retained. 

- UARB asked CDG to contact/work with Kroger and see if service station can be relocated across street to Kroger property as a way to honor history of neighborhood.

- UARB asked CDG to host neighborhood meetings to find solutions with surrounding property owners and residents.

- Residents and UARB state they fear High and Wall St traffic will be overwhelmed by project. 

- UARB was upset current structures have deteriorated under CDG ownership, mentioned they will be against any necessary demolitions. 

- UARB was hesitant to allow 5% reduction parking variance, asked CDG to creatively find a way to meet zoning req.

- CDG did present some "meh" materials but said they were willing to work with historic and higher quality materials if it would help push the project forward. I

 

Overall, the commission just seemed dead set against this, they mentioned how High should be a dense and urban corridor but then forgot that the second renderings popped on the screen. I am not sure much positive progress came of the meeting, we may get the 7-story white and gray box after all. Just so ridiculous. 

 

Edited by DevolsDance
Formatting
  • Like 1
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, aderwent said:

The apartment building closest to 315 at Founders Park is up to four floors on the elevator shafts. I was southbound on 315, but it appeared like this building is going to be right on top of the freeway, and a couple floors above.

That's the hotel, not apartments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DevolsDance said:

Quick project update for King & High

I was able to make it to the commission meeting last month, was hoping some articles would come out about it but since not... I wanted to fill you all in. 

 

Short answer, it's still a no from UARB. 

 

Long answer, here's a bullet point rundown...

 

- Portion will be "co-living" to reduce rent. Shared common spaces with private rooms, similar to pieces of Gravity II. 

- When asked, CDG said project will not cast shadows on any existing properties that the current buildings don't already.

- UARB said height variance is "major ask" and they cant support it, CDG said the tallest portion now only covers less than a quarter of total project and rest falls under 72' zoned height.

- UARB asked CDG to consider reducing project scope, says height overwhelms existing historic properties.

- UARB asked why there is a High St curb cut, CDG said city traffic and planning requested this, UARB asked CDG do full traffic study because they don't want to see curb cuts on High. 

- UARB asked what will become of old service station, CDG says it will be partially restored for garage entrance but not wholly retained. 

- UARB asked CDG to contact/work with Kroger and see if service station can be relocated across street to Kroger property as a way to honor history of neighborhood.

- UARB asked CDG to host neighborhood meetings to find solutions with surrounding property owners and residents.

- Residents and UARB state they fear High and Wall St traffic will be overwhelmed by project. 

- UARB was upset current structures have deteriorated under CDG ownership, mentioned they will be against any necessary demolitions. 

- UARB was hesitant to allow 5% reduction parking variance, asked CDG to creatively find a way to meet zoning req.

- CDG did present some "meh" materials but said they were willing to work with historic and higher quality materials if it would help push the project forward. I

 

Overall, the commission just seemed dead set against this, they mentioned how High should be a dense and urban corridor but then forgot that the second renderings popped on the screen. I am not sure much positive progress came of the meeting, we may get the 7-story white and gray box after all. Just so ridiculous. 

 

 

They should take it to the city.  It's amazing how many neighborhood commissions are full of people who hate development- and that's really what this is about.  They're simply making excuses to deny it.

Edited by jonoh81
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a curb cut is not necessarily desired but turning the old service station into an integrated garage entrance is actually interesting. Sure, integrated into a restaurant space is probably better but it's better than a total demo. 

 

Sometimes I'm convinced these people think too highly of these communities (and I'll say 'our' since I'm a University District resident). This concept of 'overwhelming historic structures' is asinine. Is the structure gonna have a panic attack? The area around campus has been bastardized for decades by cheap landlords and small beans developers and commercial developers getting away with murder but NOW we suddenly care how a historic structure is going to feel next to a tall building. As if it's a continuous in tact neighborhood.  Maybe the historic buildings felt underwhelmed by years of terrible development. 

 

I'm going to hate seeing uncommon 2.0. But at this point, I don't blame them. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another public meeting announcement for the Giant Eagle site, this time on the Short North Civic Association FB page:

 

Quote

The Short North Civic Association invites you to a special neighborhood meeting hosted by CASTO on Wednesday, February 26th, 7:00-8:00 pm in the former Giant Eagle Store at 765 Neil Ave.  CASTO will use this time to present the historical background associated with the Giant Eagle site, constraints the developer must work within in order to redevelop the center, and to solicit neighborhood feedback.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why Business First keeps calling this Victorian Village. This is in Harrison West.

 

First Look: More details emerge on $41M, 11-story tower planned in Victorian Village

 

olwt-heritage-pointe-east-side-2*1200xx3

 

"Ohio Living has a design and financing plan for a third luxury high-rise on its Westminster-Thurber Community on Neil Avenue in Victorian Village.

 

The 56-unit Heritage Pointe will cost $41 million, and is expected to bring in about $15 million in entrance fees, CFO Robert Stillman said in a recorded call with bond investors.

 

There is a 120-person waiting list for Goodale Landing, which opened in 2016. Of those on the list, Stillman said, 90 already are financially pre-qualified to buy in to the project."

 

https://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2020/02/19/first-look-more-details-emerge-on-41m-11-story.html?iana=hpmvp_colum_news_headline

  • Like 3
  • Love 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, aderwent said:

I don't know why Business First keeps calling this Victorian Village. This is in Harrison West.

 

First Look: More details emerge on $41M, 11-story tower planned in Victorian Village

 

olwt-heritage-pointe-east-side-2*1200xx3

 

"Ohio Living has a design and financing plan for a third luxury high-rise on its Westminster-Thurber Community on Neil Avenue in Victorian Village.

 

The 56-unit Heritage Pointe will cost $41 million, and is expected to bring in about $15 million in entrance fees, CFO Robert Stillman said in a recorded call with bond investors.

 

There is a 120-person waiting list for Goodale Landing, which opened in 2016. Of those on the list, Stillman said, 90 already are financially pre-qualified to buy in to the project."

 

https://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2020/02/19/first-look-more-details-emerge-on-41m-11-story.html?iana=hpmvp_colum_news_headline

 

One would think that with a waiting list that long, they would try to do more than 56 units.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jonoh81 said:

 

One would think that with a waiting list that long, they would try to do more than 56 units.  

 

Also, 56 units is all they could fit in 11-stories? How massive are these units?

 

Eh, maybe a waitlist means another tower. Overall, still really don't like the aesthetic of this project or the 2016 tower (I hate the green aluminum roof), but I didn't expect much. It'll continue to add density to the area which can help increase amenities and transit in the neighborhood, i'll take it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, DevolsDance said:

 

Also, 56 units is all they could fit in 11-stories? How massive are these units?

 

If it is modeled after Goodale Landing, anywhere from over 1100sf to nearly 1900sf

 

They are marketing to old people that want flats the size of single family homes. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the current level of demand, I wonder if they are planning to build another tower, potentially along Thurber Dr where the two covered parking structures currently are.

 

image.thumb.png.a3ac3faef69e67402175286e22f3727a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, DTCL11 said:

 

If it is modeled after Goodale Landing, anywhere from over 1100sf to nearly 1900sf

 

They are marketing to old people that want flats the size of single family homes. 

 

I want a 1100sf flat and I'm not even 40 yet!

 

I like how it looks like it is going to be built right up next to the sidewalk, and overall I like the style.  Maybe in 40 years I'll be in this place 🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere in the article but based on the zoning variance/request with the city, this project will cap out at 135' tall. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jonoh81 said:

 

One would think that with a waiting list that long, they would try to do more than 56 units.  

I thought this exact same thing. This location probably has the best view of their entire lot, why not go higher, maximize what you charge for views, and shorten the waitlist? 

 

Overall, I don't mind the design and like that it's built out to sidewalk. Hopefully this encourages some density when they redevelop the old giant eagle lot up the block. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like a tower component of 10+ stories may already be being discussed in the redevelopment of the Giant Eagle Site. Again, this also makes sense since the NIMBYs have not been able to do anything about the Westminister Thurber tower that will directly abut Neil. 

 

A couple things that stood out from the CU article to me:

 

Quote

Tonight’s meeting is with the Harrison West Society (HWS), which would eventually weigh in on any proposal for the site. Because the property sits just outside the boundaries of the Victorian Village Commission, it would not have to go before that board (so, instead of needing the approval of a historic architectural review commission to move forward, a proposal for the site would only have to be brought before the HWS for a non-binding, advisory vote).

 

So there isn't much of an opportunity for NIMBYs to formally block it like other areas?

 

Quote

Tim Price, HWS President, said that representatives of CASTO have met with the group’s executive committee and given a rough outline of the developer’s thinking for the project. It will likely include retail along Neil Avenue, with apartments either behind or above the storefronts – a residential tower could rise to a height of ten or more stories, but no decisions have yet been made about the exact scale of the project. The redevelopment could also include single family homes or other types of smaller-scale residential units.

 

One important piece of the puzzle moving forward, he added, is the CVS, which still has 11 years left on its current lease and has indicated a preference for prime frontage in any new development (which likely means a spot right at the corner of Neil and Buttles). In addition to the CVS, CASTO has indicated that some type of grocery store could also be a part of the project.

 

 

https://www.columbusunderground.com/apartment-tower-could-be-part-of-giant-eagle-redevelopment-bw1

 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, DTCL11 said:

Looks like a tower component of 10+ stories may already be being discussed in the redevelopment of the Giant Eagle Site. Again, this also makes sense since the NIMBYs have not been able to do anything about the Westminister Thurber tower that will directly abut Neil. 

 

This will be very interesting to watch. Hopefully they do go at least 10-stories high. If they do, I wonder if we could see a domino effect in the surrounding area. There are numerous 1970-1980 era suburban style apartments that would be ripe for redevelopment. I have to think a developer would be chomping at the bit to purchase The New Yorker Townhomes or the Thurber Gate Apartments, demolish them, and then put up an 8-12 story mixed-use building. 

  • Like 1
  • Love 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, cbussoccer said:

 

This will be very interesting to watch. Hopefully they do go at least 10-stories high. If they do, I wonder if we could see a domino effect in the surrounding area. There are numerous 1970-1980 era suburban style apartments that would be ripe for redevelopment. I have to think a developer would be chomping at the bit to purchase The New Yorker Townhomes or the Thurber Gate Apartments, demolish them, and then put up an 8-12 story mixed-use building. 

 

I believe that will be a natural development and that it makes sense for the cluster of mid-late century low rise apartments to be swapped for mid-rise development.  The infrastructure/set up for dumping traffic onto goodale and neil is there as well for that and should alleviate *some* traffic concerns. 

 

There are a couple hurdles to that. The owners will hold on to that land for everything. I'm sure some of those properties have long been paid off and the income they make will need to be heavily offset by a high purchasing price, perhaps beyond what we've seen in other big deals. (Wouldn't you?).

 

There is also the flip side in 'natural affordability.'  It is something Chicago is struggling with right now as parts of the city experience widespread demolition of post war - mid century buildings for newer structures that are significantly more expensive. Unfortunately, as we've seen across the US, significantly greater supply doesn't necessarily mean prices will drop. 

 

I had a friend that lived in Thurber Gate and I LOVED his apartment.  He held on until he had to leave the area for work. While still not cheap, they were more affordable at the time. Not sure what rent is now but I imagine they aren't demanding premium dollar.  Not everyone is looking for granite, hardwoods, etc etc that leads to the 'natural affordability' of dated, well kept, apartments. 

 

I'm neither here nor there on it. I certainly wouldn't chain myself to one of them if they get torn down but I can see where there is some value even if more units can be obtained through demolition and rebuilding. 

 

I will say that should that be the eventual fate, I really hope the city would put an affordability quota and actually stick to it if we are talking about hundreds of new units in a handful of mid-rise. Just my thoughts. 

Edited by DTCL11
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, 17thState said:

Hopefully this encourages some density when they redevelop the old giant eagle lot up the block. 

Great point. I didn't even think about the implications this could have on future development in that lot. 11 stories is a great way to set the precedent. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/11/2020 at 10:26 AM, Pablo said:

Hmmm, very interesting. From the Harrison West Society facebook page:

 

 

image.png.aa3c2db5df56b40f857f6d25c482a4fc.png

Was anyone able to attend? I’m antsy for some details! 
 

edit- quote didn’t work out, I’m referring to the 2/19 HW meeting about the GE site. 

Edited by FudgeRounds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, DTCL11 said:

 

I believe that will be a natural development and that it makes sense for the cluster of mid-late century low rise apartments to be swapped for mid-rise development.  The infrastructure/set up for dumping traffic onto goodale and neil is there as well for that and should alleviate *some* traffic concerns. 

 

There are a couple hurdles to that. The owners will hold on to that land for everything. I'm sure some of those properties have long been paid off and the income they make will need to be heavily offset by a high purchasing price, perhaps beyond what we've seen in other big deals. (Wouldn't you?).

 

There is also the flip side in 'natural affordability.'  It is something Chicago is struggling with right now as parts of the city experience widespread demolition of post war - mid century buildings for newer structures that are significantly more expensive. Unfortunately, as we've seen across the US, significantly greater supply doesn't necessarily mean prices will drop. 

 

I had a friend that lived in Thurber Gate and I LOVED his apartment.  He held on until he had to leave the area for work. While still not cheap, they were more affordable at the time. Not sure what rent is now but I imagine they aren't demanding premium dollar.  Not everyone is looking for granite, hardwoods, etc etc that leads to the 'natural affordability' of dated, well kept, apartments. 

 

I'm neither here nor there on it. I certainly wouldn't chain myself to one of them if they get torn down but I can see where there is some value even if more units can be obtained through demolition and rebuilding. 

 

I will say that should that be the eventual fate, I really hope the city would put an affordability quota and actually stick to it if we are talking about hundreds of new units in a handful of mid-rise. Just my thoughts. 

 

That whole area was just an extension of Harrison West/VV in terms of being a historic, largely single-family neighborhood.  Everything west of Neil and Harrison and south of 1st Avenue was demo'd in 1960 as part of "slum clearance".  We're talking hundreds of buildings.  At one point, everything west of Neil north to OSU was proposed to be demolished, but luckily it didn't happen (though OSU and Battelle have whittled things down over the years).  

Most of the current development in this area is mid-century crap.  It would be a perfect area to completely rebuild over time, including restoring at least some of the original street grid.  While the loss of more affordable housing (for the area) would be a negative, there is nothing stopping any new development from including affordable units, especially if it was mandated.  As it stands, this entire area is a lot of wasted space in a prime location.  It was built according to 1960 suburban standards.

Edited by jonoh81
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, FudgeRounds said:

Was anyone able to attend? I’m antsy for some details! 
 

edit- quote didn’t work out, I’m referring to the 2/19 HW meeting about the GE site. 

 

Yep, I was able to swing by for a few while it was being discussed. 

 

- Neighbors generally open to taller development in this location

- Casto said they are considering anything from 8-15 stories along Collins and Neil, shorter 3-5 stories along Buttles 

- Hidden or underground parking structure to handle increased density but restoring character to area

- CVS has 11 years left in their lease, will be given a prime location in new development

- CVS has must stay open during development, project may be phased

- Casto interested in luring a Trader Joes/Aldi/Whole Foods market with a 12,000 - 15,000 sq/ft retail along Neil or Buttles

- Biggest concerns were wanting Casto to favor/re-incorporate existing plaza business into development 

 

  • Like 5
  • Love 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, DevolsDance said:

 

Yep, I was able to swing by for a few while it was being discussed. 

 

- Neighbors generally open to taller development in this location

- Casto said they are considering anything from 8-15 stories along Collins and Neil, shorter 3-5 stories along Buttles 

- Hidden or underground parking structure to handle increased density but restoring character to area

- CVS has 11 years left in their lease, will be given a prime location in new development

- CVS has must stay open during development, project may be phased

- Casto interested in luring a Trader Joes/Aldi/Whole Foods market with a 12,000 - 15,000 sq/ft retail along Neil or Buttles

- Biggest concerns were wanting Casto to favor/re-incorporate existing plaza business into development 

 

 

Can this get any better? And bless you for your attendane.

Edited by Zyrokai
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the Harrison West Society FB page:

 

Quote

Thank you to all those that came out last night to learn about the Neil Ave Giant Eagle plaza redevelopment. The meeting was very well attended and productive. We loved seeing so many new faces, this is what community looks like! Full meeting minutes can be found at the link listed in the bottom of this post. Below is a high level summary.

Recap of Casto's **tentative** concept:
(1) Retail on the east/northeast of the property towards Neil Avenue, including retaining CVS and (hopefully, but they've expressed confidence) a grocer;
(2) Residential, about 4 stories, on the northwest (towards Buttles and Thurber);
(3) Residential, about 10-15 stories, on the southwest (towards Thurber and Collins).

 

Here are the full minutes:

http://harrisonwest.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/HWS_Minutes_02.19.2020.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1hgx7NkvyDhZ0boUpBqGAkg6sEXX-_JHF6dFkRRy-rX1pxW0oQZ3tb-bk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/19/2020 at 5:10 PM, DTCL11 said:

 

I believe that will be a natural development and that it makes sense for the cluster of mid-late century low rise apartments to be swapped for mid-rise development.  The infrastructure/set up for dumping traffic onto goodale and neil is there as well for that and should alleviate *some* traffic concerns. 

 

There are a couple hurdles to that. The owners will hold on to that land for everything. I'm sure some of those properties have long been paid off and the income they make will need to be heavily offset by a high purchasing price, perhaps beyond what we've seen in other big deals. (Wouldn't you?).

 

There is also the flip side in 'natural affordability.'  It is something Chicago is struggling with right now as parts of the city experience widespread demolition of post war - mid century buildings for newer structures that are significantly more expensive. Unfortunately, as we've seen across the US, significantly greater supply doesn't necessarily mean prices will drop. 

 

I had a friend that lived in Thurber Gate and I LOVED his apartment.  He held on until he had to leave the area for work. While still not cheap, they were more affordable at the time. Not sure what rent is now but I imagine they aren't demanding premium dollar.  Not everyone is looking for granite, hardwoods, etc etc that leads to the 'natural affordability' of dated, well kept, apartments. 

 

I'm neither here nor there on it. I certainly wouldn't chain myself to one of them if they get torn down but I can see where there is some value even if more units can be obtained through demolition and rebuilding. 

 

I will say that should that be the eventual fate, I really hope the city would put an affordability quota and actually stick to it if we are talking about hundreds of new units in a handful of mid-rise. Just my thoughts. 

 

This is happening a lot in Northern Kentucky and is a real problem. Especially when '70s apartments come down and get replaced with expensive new developments right next to an empty lot!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Casto eyes mixed-use redevelopment of Neil Avenue shopping center previously home to Giant Eagle

 

Although the plans presented were preliminary, Casto representatives heard one thing loud and clear from neighbors: They want a grocery store.

 

More below:

https://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2020/02/20/casto-eyes-mixed-use-redevelopment-of-neil-avenue.html


"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the article:

 

Quote

Right now, Leibowitz said, the pharmacy does appear open to striking a deal. It would require a corner lot and conventional surface parking for its new space, but it does seem like the company is "willing to evaluate a new position and relocation within the project," Leibowitz said.

 

That's disappointing. Manageable but disappointing. I had hoped CVS might take the opportunity to transition this store to a more urban model seen in Chicago but that doesn't seem likely with an archaic contingent like this. *hopefully* it can be minimized or at least mitigated with direct access to parking structure. 

 

They plan to return in April with a more concrete design. 

 

The architecture firm Edge is their design partner. Their portfolio doesn't particularly excite me. This seems like it will be a joint first time venture into mid-rise for Casto and Edge. Everyone has to have their first so we will see what they bring. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, DTCL11 said:

The architecture firm Edge is their design partner. Their portfolio doesn't particularly excite me. This seems like it will be a joint first time venture into mid-rise for Casto and Edge. Everyone has to have their first so we will see what they bring. 

 

I think Edge is probably only providing land use planning services, which would make sense considering this project is still in the very early planning stages. Based on Edge's website they don't seem to do building architecture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, DTCL11 said:

I had hoped CVS might take the opportunity to transition this store to a more urban model seen in Chicago

 

Ironically, downtown Chicago has a Walgreen's with a surface parking lot at the corner of Clark and Ontario.

 

image.thumb.png.3c3139033fd8ba891538b0191c24012a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, DTCL11 said:

This seems like it will be a joint first time venture into mid-rise for Casto and Edge. Everyone has to have their first so we will see what they bring.

River and Rich II is twelve floors.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, aderwent said:

River and Rich II is twelve floors.

 

I forgot Casto had that. Woot woot for two midrises then!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, .justin said:

 

I think Edge is probably only providing land use planning services, which would make sense considering this project is still in the very early planning stages. Based on Edge's website they don't seem to do building architecture.

EDGE are land planners and landscape architects. They did River and Rich for Casto and Moody Nolan was the architect. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely not my best picture ever (sorry I was on my bike), but the project at 5th and Highland has kicked into full gear.

Underground garage has started concrete pours and the street level has been shored up. 

 

IMG_5066.thumb.JPG.8cef2248d5a12fdd818109ac5ac59223.JPG

 

Sorry again for the angle, but enjoy!

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Founders Park from the Olentangy Trail (Wed. Mar. 25). Closest to the trail is the Hotel building. 

jRL6sA.jpg

 

The Senior Housing building just to the right of the hotels elevator tower. 

jRLQAQ.jpg

 

To the right (large white wall) is the topped out parking garage. Access roadways have been pored for the townhouses and single family homes on the south side of the lot (no picture).

jRLkZq.jpg

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/4/2020 at 12:20 PM, Columbo said:

^ That is going to be a major upgrade for that block.  Here is an aerial of that block when the circa 1975 elementary school occupied it:

49327943678_3405f0778e_b_d.jpg

 

And here's a rendering one of the new replacement buildings - as seen from Fifth Avenue:

screen-shot-2019-01-17-at-45159-pm*1200x

According to the 2019 Business First article about this project at https://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2019/01/18/140-unit-apartment-project-in-the-university.html:

 

"Vision Development wants to build a mixed-use project on the site of the former Fifth Avenue Alternative Elementary School at 1300 Forsythe Avenue in Dennison Place.  Plans call for two buildings on the block, bound by 5th and 6th avenues.  The development would have a pair of 3,000- to 5,000-square-foot retail areas with about 134 apartment units above.  Grass courtyards and parking spaces would go between the buildings.  Another part of the development will include some for-sale units."

Have we seen a final site plan for this? I've been going back through this forum and doing some digging online and I haven't found an actual visual for the site plan, just descriptions of what elements are going where. Just curious if someone has it on hand to share?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...