Jump to content

Cincinnati: State of Downtown


Guest grasscat

Recommended Posts

Guest jmecklenborg

^Plus, there was a second Sneaky Pete's out in a Milford strip mall.  I went to each multiple times. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Go Bananas should move downtown! I hate having to drive out to Montgomery every time a big name comedian I want to see comes to Cincinnati.

 

There are "big name" comedians at Go Bananas?

 

I saw Mike Birbiglia there in March. A lot of comedians that have had Comedy Central specials perform at Go Bananas. Of course if you're talking about somebody huge like Chris Rock, they're going to be at the Taft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I'm liking these projects that are pushing greater density of units. 60 units in a building like this is a great amount. That should add a ton of life to that corner of Downtown that's seeing a lot of development.

 

Edit: Also makes me curious why the upper levels of the building Igby's is in never went through their conversion. The plans were interesting. Seems like a missed opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overlooked Cincinnati business owners want to shine light on 'Low-TR'

 

Every night, downtown hundreds of residents and workers make the trek from the heart of the central business district to the bars and restaurants of Over-the-Rhine to eat, drink, shop and socialize. But what if they had a closer option?

 

That’s a question that Steve Swartz, co-owner of Shooks Bar & Dance, wants to answer. Shooks opened May 12 at 920 Race St., on the edge of the central business district near Over-the-Rhine. It's part of a nine-block area framed by Central Parkway and Walnut, Eighth and Elm streets that people like Swartz want to turn into a viable alternative to OTR.

 

“The good thing about OTR is you’ve got restaurants to eat, you’ve got parking, you’re close to multiple options for bars,” he said. “Here, we’re a smaller district but we’re growing.”

 

More below:

http://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/news/2017/07/03/overlooked-cincinnati-business-owners-want-to.html

 

2334562_1497626274207.jpg

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Is there any good reason that 8th and 9th streets are not two-way across all of downtown? 8th is two way for one block but then stops which I imagine is confusing for drivers and jams up the walnut/7th intersection. And 9th is not heavily traveled. Making both of these two-way would probably help the traffic that is on seventh going towards 71N.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every east/west street downtown from 2nd to 9th connects to a highway ramp on one or both sides, so they will not be converted to two-way. At least not until all of the traffic engineers working for the city retire.

 

 

7th is eastbound because traffic from the 8th Street Viaduct gets dumped there; and it also funnels cars to the Gilbert Avenue onramp.

 

8th is westbound (on the east side of downtown) because the Gilbert Avenue offramp gets dumped there.

 

9th is westbound because it leads to the 8th Street Viaduct onramp.

 

 

The downtown street with the highest likelihood of being converted to two-way is Fourth Street. Currently there is a ramp from Fourth to I-75 North on the west side of downtown. However, during the rebuild of Fort Washington Way, a stub ramp was installed from Third Street leading towards I-75 North. The plan was: when the new bridge gets built, they will use the Third Street ramp to connect to I-75N and the Fourth Street ramp can be eliminated. Then, Fourth can be converted to two-way as it does not connect to a highway on either end.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

EXCLUSIVE: New York investor to pour millions into downtown tower

Aug 19, 2015, 2:53pm EDT

 

 

A New York City-based real estate private equity firm plans to invest millions of dollars in 250 East Fifth Street, the downtown office tower formerly known as Chiquita Center.

 

HighBrook Investors acquired the ground leasehold interest in 250 East Fifth Street, the nearly 537,200-square-foot class A office building. The real estate, the building itself and the land underneath, is owned by the Joseph family’s Columbia Development Corp.

 

http://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/news/2015/08/19/exclusive-new-york-investor-to-pour-millions-into.html

 

Work on the lobby is underway. They are marketing the building via http://www.250eastfifth.com - "118,170 Contiguous RSF of Top Floor Space Available"

 

ExteriorPlazaImprovements?format=1500w

"It's just fate, as usual, keeping its bargain and screwing us in the fine print..." - John Crichton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

EXCLUSIVE: $44 million boutique hotel coming to downtown Cincinnati

 

By Tom Demeropolis

 

 

A nearly $44 million transformation of a class B office building into a boutique hotel is expected to start soon in the heart of Cincinnati’s Central Business District.

 

 

Kimpton Hotels & Restaurants will open a boutique hotel in the Traction Building, also known as the Tri-State Building, located at 432 Walnut St. Just steps from Fountain Square, the conversion of the nearly vacant building into a 153-room hotel would be another step in the city’s renaissance.

 

 

Mike DeFrino, CEO of Kimpton Hotels & Restaurants, said after seeing success with opening hotels in Milwaukee, Cleveland and Chicago, “Cincinnati seemed like the natural next step.

“All truly great thoughts are conceived while walking.”
-Friedrich Nietzsche

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Guest jmecklenborg

The Chiquita Center Columbia Tower renovates lobby:

 

https://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/news/2018/02/13/columbia-plaza-shows-off-multimillion-dollar.html#g/429133/1

 

 

This building originally had an abstract fiberglass sculpture in the fountain.  It was exiled to Pyramid Hill about ten years ago.  I predict an eventual Metrobot-type comeback. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I don’t know if this is the right place to talk about this...

 

But what will it take for Cincinnati to become more diverse? I feel when I’m in the cbd on a week day, it’s probably 3/4th African American.

 

I’ve been in a lot of cities like Toronto, Montreal, Chicago, etc. bigger cities I guess.

 

In cincy I feel like it’s rare for any diversity and if there is diversity it’s mainly restricted to a small section of otr nowadays.

 

Gay, black, white, Asian, Latino, etc. would just love to see more color in the city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sections that you see the most diversity are the ones that are already re developed. I think once you see more development and more people living downtown it will be more diversified. Even 5-6 years ago there wasn’t that much diversification downtown that there is today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t know if this is the right place to talk about this...

 

But what will it take for Cincinnati to become more diverse? I feel when I’m in the cbd on a week day, it’s probably 3/4th African American.

 

I’ve been in a lot of cities like Toronto, Montreal, Chicago, etc. bigger cities I guess.

 

In cincy I feel like it’s rare for any diversity and if there is diversity it’s mainly restricted to a small section of otr nowadays.

 

Gay, black, white, Asian, Latino, etc. would just love to see more color in the city.

 

Actually, you know what is pretty diverse by Cincinnati standards? The crowds at Kenwood mall. I guess there's something to say there about how downtown isn't really an economic crossroads like it was last century, but Kenwood has filled that role with the ongoing collapse/consolidation of brick and mortar retail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attracting immigrants is the most realistic way to substantially boost diversity. Perhaps the only realistic way. UC bringing in more foreign students, and becoming a more global university generally, would help a little. Any Ohio city is at a disadvantage, given the state's geographical position. But Columbus and Dayton seem to be doing better at attracting immigrants than Cincinnati, so maybe there are some lessons those cities can teach. Still, no Ohio city is very diverse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attracting immigrants is the most realistic way to substantially boost diversity. Perhaps the only realistic way. UC bringing in more foreign students, and becoming a more global university generally, would help a little. Any Ohio city is at a disadvantage, given the state's geographical position. But Columbus and Dayton seem to be doing better at attracting immigrants than Cincinnati, so maybe there are some lessons those cities can teach. Still, no Ohio city is very diverse.

 

although Ohio isn't that diverse overall, it's incorrect to say "no city is very diverse." As a matter of fact, a Cincinnati suburb, Springdale, is ranked no. 1 in diversity, and Painesville is close behind in 2nd place, by a fraction of a point, proof that diversity is not necessarily found only in large cities. That said, there are states with dozens of cities and towns with scores in the 80's (some even in the 90's). If anyone wants to check the listings for 200 Ohio cities (or to compare other states; for example, NYC's score is 84.8 ), go to Hometownlocator.com and click the "Diversity Index" selection  https://ohio.hometownlocator.com/census/sorted-demographics.cfm

 

39763633375_03d56ed06a_c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ "diversity is not necessarily found only in large cities"

 

In fact, it's easier to obtain in smaller cities, as your list indicates. I know 'city' has a specific definition, which includes Springdale and Painesville, but I wasn't intending to include anything in the state that isn't the primary municipality in its own MSA.

 

Regardless, the 200th most-diverse city in CA and the 59th most-diverse city in NJ score higher than the 1st most-diverse city in OH, which I think illustrates my point. If we rule out non-MSA-center cities, it looks worse. I wouldn't call the 60s (or even 70s) on that index "very high."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^well, I remember reading that the diversity score for the US overall is about 60--and I imagine for Ohio it's a lot lower--so for a city to receive a 75 is certainly good. But I'm not sure what you mean by the point that diversity is "easier to obtain in smaller cities," since the scores are based on census data (unless you think census results are somehow rigged or faulty--ha ha. Confession: I worked on the 2010 census, so they probably are. lol). And yes, I made the point that other states have cities & towns with much higher diversity, as you pointed out. However, maybe it is unfair to compare small towns to big cities. Below is a link to the Esri diversity map (upon which I believe the Hometownlocator results are based) from 2010, and if you zoom into specific neighborhoods of various cities, you'll find far higher scores than is reflected in the overall city score. Even for Painesville, my old 'hood is 79. And I can see that the west side of Cleveland has much higher scores than the east side (probably because of greater Latino population--I think).

 

http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?layers=2bf88a04f82d499a8a635040ab5e423e

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason I say it's easier for a smaller city is because a smaller number of people constitutes a larger percentage. A diverse population of a small city can easily be assembled from the existing population within a metro area (if a sizable chunk of a metro's Latinos, for example, groups into one municipality in a region (which is fairly normal), even in a region with primarily black & white residents, then that municipality gets a moderately high diversity rating). Whereas to boost the rating for a large city, you have to draw people from outside the metro to shift the percentages significantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason I say it's easier for a smaller city is because a smaller number of people constitutes a larger percentage. A diverse population of a small city can easily be assembled from the existing population within a metro area (if a sizable chunk of a metro's Latinos, for example, groups into one municipality in a region (which is fairly normal), even in a region with primarily black & white residents, then that municipality gets a moderately high diversity rating). Whereas to boost the rating for a large city, you have to draw people from outside the metro to shift the percentages significantly.

 

what?  You make it sound like diversity exists in a small town as the result of a social experiment in which some demographer persuaded a bunch of people of different races to see what it would be like to live together. Why don't the same factors that increase diversity in a large city apply to a small one? Diversity occurs from a variety of reasons, not by some calculated scheme to "draw people from the outside."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think all Robuu is trying to say is that looking at a small, arbitrarily defined area (let's face it, city boundaries in the US are pretty arbitrary) can cause some issues with interpreting data. Everyone complains about how sprawly Columbus is, but if you were to arbitrarily only look at the High Street corridor, you'd see a much different picture with respect to density. The same thing can happen with small towns. If you look at a small town, having one or two nonwhite families can make that one town look very diverse, and percentage wise it is, but if you look across the entire metro, that one nonwhite family may not make as significant of a difference.

“To an Ohio resident - wherever he lives - some other part of his state seems unreal.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think all Robuu is trying to say is that looking at a small, arbitrarily defined area (let's face it, city boundaries in the US are pretty arbitrary) can cause some issues with interpreting data. Everyone complains about how sprawly Columbus is, but if you were to arbitrarily only look at the High Street corridor, you'd see a much different picture with respect to density. The same thing can happen with small towns. If you look at a small town, having one or two nonwhite families can make that one town look very diverse, and percentage wise it is, but if you look across the entire metro, that one nonwhite family may not make as significant of a difference.

 

Okay, we're not talking about "one or two nonwhite families" in either Springdale or Painesville. Both towns have thousands of people (believe it or not!), but the same metrics (if that's the correct term) apply when determining diversity, regardless of the population. I don't know what you mean by "arbitrarily defined area," as if a city can change its boundaries at whim--wtf? There are no "issues" with interpreting data. The same formula is being used to calculate the diversity score for a city of any size. It just seems that you and Robuu don't want to admit that there is more diversity in two small towns (plus in mrnyc's Lorain ;)) than there is in the largest cities of Ohio. I predict (mark my words) that when the next update comes out, Painesville will be #1 on the list. Take that, 3-C's. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But again, a significant concentration of people in a small geographic area doesn't make as huge of an effect across the entire metro area. That's not to diminish the effect of these cities in attracting diversity, but as a part of their respective metro regions, their localized diversity doesn't make much of a difference. The diversity in Painesville, as great as it is, doesn't help balance out the lack of diversity in North Ridgeville or Middleburg Heights. I think that's all that is being said here.

“To an Ohio resident - wherever he lives - some other part of his state seems unreal.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The context of this discussion is the urban core of Cincinnati, so when I said "No Ohio city is very diverse," I was implicitly talking about cities that have at least loosely comparably sized urban cores to Cincinnati. And, yes, to increase the percentage of "gays, Asians, Latinos" (diversity as defined by troeros's post, which I was replying to), you need to "draw people in."

 

The rest of the discussion boils down to opinions of 1) what the threshold is for "very diverse" and 2) whether diversity of one small municipality in a non-diverse metro is significant in the present context. YMMV on those so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Where are the 1,554 condo units under construction mentioned in this article?  Number seems flat out wrong to me. Doesn’t seem to be that many total units including apartments under construction either. Maybe that many total units in planning stages (ie, including projects that may or may not get built?)

 

Downtown population ebbs, but may be set to surge with condo influx

 

https://cin.ci/2r2aDXz

www.cincinnatiideas.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

U.S. Bank plans to add 400 jobs in downtown Cincinnati

By Erin Caproni  – Digital Producer, Cincinnati Business Courier

 

 

 

U.S. Bank could add 400 jobs to its downtown Cincinnati operations.

 

The Minneapolis-based bank received approval for a 2.1 percent, 10-year tax credit from the Ohio Tax Credit Authority to create those jobs, which would create $19.2 million in annual payroll while retaining $160,683,000 in existing payroll.

 

https://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/news/2018/04/30/u-s-bank-plans-to-add-400-jobs-in-downtown.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jmecklenborg

Expand its existing building?  Like add floors?  Or expand into more of that building?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Expand its existing building?  Like add floors?  Or expand into more of that building?

I seriously doubt they would add floors to the existing US Bank tower downtown. That just seems like it'd be incredibly expensive and hard to justify. I think they're either expanding their lease to use more of the existing floors and/or renovating their current space to allow for more employees per floor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They also own other real estate in town. I believe they own the Power Building on 4th and Race so they could go there. They used to own the INgalls building and used that as space in the past too. There is nothing that says they cant lease space in another building either. Sounds like most of these jobs are operational and would likely go to class B space. I can imagine them putting them in the old First National Tower or maybe even Mercantile or the Huntington Bank building depending on the type of positions there are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Study: Cincinnati CBD has less vacant land than NYC

 

central-riverfront*1024xx734-413-0-52.jpg

 

Less than 3 percent of Cincinnati's Central Business District is undeveloped land, according to a recent study.

 

Conducted by real estate blog Commercial Cafe, the study used data from Yardi Matrix and PropertyShark, real estate data websites owned by parent company Yardi Systems, to analyze vacant land in the central business districts of the 25 largest cities in the nation. The report found 584 acres of vacant land across all 25 business districts. Undeveloped land in Cincinnati accounted for 2 percent of its total.

 

The Queen City was ranked the 12th most dense business district of all observed cities with more than 14.2 acres — roughly 620,000 square feet — of vacant development space. That's nearly twice the size of Washington Park.

 

Dallas reported the most development potential with more than 86 acres of vacant land, while Tampa, Fla. had the most dense central business district with just more than 6 acres of undeveloped space.

 

More below:

https://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/news/2018/05/25/study-cincinnati-cbd-has-less-vacant-land-than-nyc.html

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That study is bonkers. When Tampa and "most dense" are in a sentence together something must be hinky. What is the CBD in New York, do you pick downtown or midtown? Is it all of lower Manhattan or just the financial district? There is a 1000 foot plus tower going up on a 50' wide lot in the financial district, https://ny.curbed.com/2017/4/26/15436392/45-broad-supertall-cetraruddy-madison I think they have less developable land than us.

 

All that said, Cincinnati is more dense than most other midwestern and western US cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The area considered to be "Midtown" (the area they used in the survey) is between 3 to 5.4 times greater (depending on what you count as the southern border of Midtown) than the area bound by Central Parkway, I-75, Eggleston, and the Ohio River. In absolute terms, even if we forget counting parking as "development" Midtown has WAY less undeveloped land per square mile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The Herschede building at 4 W Fourth St has sat vacant for the last decade, ever since it was bought by a NY-based investor around 2008, according to this article: https://www.cincinnati.com/story/money/2018/07/12/history-sale-two-iconic-downtown-buildings-listed-sale/776388002/

 

Is there anything the City can do to penalize property owners for holding property vacant? It's a double drain on downtown life, because it a) robs the street of activity and b) indirectly raises rent on other building by reducing supply. Have other cities done anything innovative to combat landlords who just want to hold their properties vacant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Herschede building at 4 W Fourth St has sat vacant for the last decade, ever since it was bought by a NY-based investor around 2008, according to this article: https://www.cincinnati.com/story/money/2018/07/12/history-sale-two-iconic-downtown-buildings-listed-sale/776388002/

 

Is there anything the City can do to penalize property owners for holding property vacant? It's a double drain on downtown life, because it a) robs the street of activity and b) indirectly raises rent on other building by reducing supply. Have other cities done anything innovative to combat landlords who just want to hold their properties vacant?

 

Philadelphia instituted a property tax overhaul that they call the Actual Value Initiative. Among other things, it transferred much of the taxable value of a property from the improvements to the underlying land. Not a true land value tax, but working toward that. It was supposed to make sitting on vacant and underutilized properties less appealing, especially downtown and in other high demand neighborhoods. It's only been a few years so I'm not sure there's a lot of data to show whether or not it has had an effect.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_value_tax

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That study is bonkers. When Tampa and "most dense" are in a sentence together something must be hinky. What is the CBD in New York, do you pick downtown or midtown? Is it all of lower Manhattan or just the financial district? There is a 1000 foot plus tower going up on a 50' wide lot in the financial district, https://ny.curbed.com/2017/4/26/15436392/45-broad-supertall-cetraruddy-madison I think they have less developable land than us.

 

All that said, Cincinnati is more dense than most other midwestern and western US cities.

 

Is that building density or population?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we wanna go into building who have been vacant and left basically abandon, look at 312 Race Street. Its the old Pogue warehouse building, prime real estate in the front of the city. Drury hotel group bought the building in 2003!. There is a 30 year tax abatement on the building, not sure how or why. 15 years have gone by since they purchased the building and nothing has been done. Its a shame because the building either needs to come down, or reworked.

 

Also attached I found an old proposal for the site that carries the Drury name.

street-view-002-red.thumb.jpg.eb0180aa6d3ee67846014fb43d5e893b.jpg

083-0001-0050-00.jpg.4ad8a84a618970a86200f4a16892188a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jmecklenborg

The Nashville Convention Center just bought a piece of vacant land on an adjacent lot to park semi trailers for $190/sq foot.  That's well over double what land goes for in DT Cincinnati and OTR. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...