mrclifton88 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 http://www.cleveland.com/cuyahoga-county/index.ssf/2015/09/cuyahoga_county_needs_new_downtown_courthouse_and_jail_officials_say.html#incart_river_home Cuyahoga County needs new downtown courthouse and jail, officials say "CLEVELAND, Ohio - Cuyahoga County officials have all but concluded that they must build a jail and courthouse in downtown Cleveland and then demolish the 40-year-old Justice Center between Lakeside and St. Clair avenues. County Executive Armond Budish has yet to report what he wants to do with the Justice Center, but a representative of the Budish administration and County Council members say spending money on renovations seems foolish. "The thing is falling apart," said council member Michael Gallagher. "I have not heard an argument that makes sense of putting money into the facility. It was built to last, designed to last, but didn't. It is poorly designed and has not lived up to what it was supposed to be."" Shall we have a demo party? :-P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Finding a new site for this thing is going to be a nightmare. I think their best bet would be to try to rebuild it on the same site. Move everybody out of one building, then demolish and replace it, then repeat with the next. The shuffling would be a nightmare for several years, of course, but probably not as bad as the public fights around trying to put it in the WHD or by CSU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanophile Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 It would be such a joy to see the atrocious Justice Center torn down. But I wonder where they would build the new courthouse and jail. I'm sure they like having the courts right across from the county courthouse building. I suppose they could build on one of the vast Warehouse District lots, but I'd prefer if they were instead developed with mixed uses. A jail is, by definition, going to be a terrible street presence, so it would be nice if they could build it somewhere more isolated. If the City can consolidate its Division of Printing into another building, perhaps the new jail and courthouse could go on Lakeside, next to the FBI building. I'm just brainstorming here. And obviously, this raises the question: what could be done with the current Justice Center site? I would love to see that site properly developed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clefan98 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Cuyahoga County needs new downtown courthouse and jail, officials say CLEVELAND, Ohio - Cuyahoga County officials have all but concluded that they must build a jail and courthouse in downtown Cleveland and then demolish the 40-year-old Justice Center between Lakeside and St. Clair avenues. County Executive Armond Budish has yet to report what he wants to do with the Justice Center, but a representative of the Budish administration and County Council members say spending money on renovations seems foolish. "The thing is falling apart," said council member Michael Gallagher. "I have not heard an argument that makes sense of putting money into the facility. It was built to last, designed to last, but didn't. It is poorly designed and has not lived up to what it was supposed to be." http://www.cleveland.com/cuyahoga-county/index.ssf/2015/09/cuyahoga_county_needs_new_downtown_courthouse_and_jail_officials_say.html#incart_river_home Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
327 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Wow, that's big news. Where to put a new complex? What to do with the current site? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 ^Either on the Division of Printing site, or just south of their, somewhere between East 13th and 18th and Lakeside and St. Clair. It would be "out of the way", and still have good access for all the lawyers clustered around East 9th/St. Clair area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
327 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 ^Either on the Division of Printing site, or just south of their, somewhere between East 13th and 18th and Lakeside and St. Clair. It would be "out of the way", and still have good access for all the lawyers clustered around East 9th/St. Clair area. That makes the most sense... by a mile, really... but I'm a lawyer who rides the Rapid, so I wouldn't mind keeping it near Tower City. Maybe they could use a WHD parking lot and put jail portion on Frankfurt, as out of the way as possible. Regardless, anything is better than the current Justice Center. That building is just awful, top to bottom, inside and out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StapHanger Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Worth remembering that for several decades before the Justice Center, the criminal courts were located on East 21st, between Payne and Superior. The idea the this stuff has to be in the heart of downtown is relatively recent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJP Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 I say put it on Lakeside just west of Courthouse Square. Build a parking garage in The Pit where the old union station was. This will be accessible to the existing law offices, lots of lunch spots nearby, have lots of parking, and it's a short walk to the West 3rd Waterfront Line station. Besides, isn't this site on Lakeside county owned? “What is the meaning of this city? Do you huddle close together because you love each other?” Or “We all dwell together to make money from each other”? -- TS Eliot’s The Rock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
down4cle Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 I hope that the Justice Center site doesn't turn into a surface lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foraker Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Could eminent domain be used to buy up a nearby parking lot for development (new court and jail) by the county? Then we could sell the old county site to someone who promises to build on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cleburger Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Who approved the design and construction of that building way back when? Is it me, or do the government buildings of the last 40 years have a planned obsolescence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMB Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Would a new center have to be so closed off? Could you put it in the warehouse district with Retail on the ground? What about Retail and the RTA hub that was proposed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SixthCity Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Just spitballing here but it's almost certain that the County will do a deal like what they just did with their headquarters - have a private developer build/own/operate and they will pay rent. The County already has a relationship with Geis and from all accounts is very happy with their new headquarters. Geis is buying up more land in the area of E. 9th and Prospect. Should we be looking at that spot? Edit: Any County deal like that would have to go through the public bidding process. But if Geis is looking, the locational advantage of having all County functions in one area may be key when the County weighs options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mendo Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 As much as I hate the complex, I can't get behind spending $500 million on new digs when the current building is barely 40 years old. These structures were built to last twice that long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SixthCity Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 As much as I hate the complex, I can't get behind spending $500 million on new digs when the current building is barely 40 years old. These structures were built to last twice that long. I agree. I love new development but it is shameful that something like that could be built and be on the table for demo this quickly. Remind yourself that Group Plan buildings were built in the early 1900s and have been continuously occupied!!! I'm in the Justice Center a good deal and although it's a disgusting building, I find it suspicious that it's a foregone conclusion that it's structurally unsalvageable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StapHanger Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 ^^You may have a very well-founded complaint about the initial design quality and maintenance for the last 40 years, but it's a sunk cost at this point. The county needs to make a decision based on life cycle costs over some horizon starting as of today, given today's building condition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SixthCity Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 I hope this isn't what Freddy Collier was talking about when he mentioned something "very exciting" for downtown. Got my blood pressure up for nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mendo Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 ^^You may have a very well-founded complaint about the initial design quality and maintenance for the last 40 years, but it's a sunk cost at this point. The county needs to make a decision based on life cycle costs over some horizon starting as of today, given today's building condition. Buildings older and in worse shape are frequently remodeled into modern space (office or residential). I don't disagree with your point, but the reward for decades of poor (or no) maintenance should not be a bottomless pit of money. Admittedly I've been in the complex only a couple times, but it seemed no worse than most other buildings of that age. Certainly nothing that warranted a full scale rebuild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
327 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 There's been a lot of belt-tightening at the County recently. Didn't they just announce 10% cuts in every department? This might be why. I'm surprised it's just now getting media coverage. Hopefully this time they do build something capable of serving multiple generations. 40 years is a ridiculous lifespan for an office tower. Quite the scandal in retrospect! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
down4cle Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 I hope this isn't what Freddy Collier was talking about when he mentioned something "very exciting" for downtown. Got my blood pressure up for nothing. I think this is pretty huge news actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hts121 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Wow. I had heard some rumblings, but never thought this day would actually come. I once heard that the County spent more money to build the JC than was spent building the Sears Tower. I am trying to think of all that the JC houses. I believe it has all of the following: the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas general division for both criminal and civil, the Cuyahoga County Clerk of Courts, the Cuyahoga County Jail and Sheriff's office, Cleveland Municipal Court and its Clerk of Courts, Cleveland Police HQ, and the city jail. My personal ideal outcome would be to split the Justice Center into separate complexes. One could be for the jails and criminal cases. The other could be for civil litigation matters, including the general division and maybe the two which are in the old county courthouse (probate and domestic relations). Put the criminal stuff and the jails on the outskirts of downtown, or maybe even beyond that, and leave the civil divisions in the heart of downtown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matteusleus Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 I concede that the JC is not an attractive building but it is a good example of brutalist architecture and although it is not en vogue now, I believe its worth preserving to give character to the skyline and city. It is interesting to walk down the street and see examples of buildings from different era's... this is what gives character to cities. The opposite of character can be said of the new generic Cuyahoga County building which looks like it could belong in a Beachwood office park. Until all the large swaths of vacant lots downtown are redeveloped, we should not tear down a building because nobody likes the style at the moment. As strong as the exterior structure appears to be, I would love to see this redeveloped as apartments, hotel, or whatever else would be the highest and best use. If the county needs a new JC, so be it and the area by the FBI building seems like a perfectly good spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanophile Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Put the jail & criminal courts on the current Division of Printing site, and put the police HQ and civil courts downtown. I think maybe even the criminal courts could be kept downtown. Just add some holding cells to the new Justice Center. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hts121 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 ^I think you need the police HQ and City jail on the same site, just like you need county jail and Sheriff on the same site. Fire HQ is on the outskirts of downtown. No reason police can't in the same area. All they do is drive into the basement anyways. ^^If I read above correctly, the demolition is not due to some perceived aesthetic flaws (which this board certainly believes to exist), but rather due to structural issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Htsguy Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 ^both municipal and common pleas judges handle civil and criminal cases. I don't think they would want to travel to two different locations and they would want their own courtrooms rather than sharing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matteusleus Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 ^^If I read above correctly, the demolition is not due to some perceived aesthetic flaws (which this board certainly believes to exist), but rather due to structural issues. From the article: Public Works Director Michael Dever said the exterior of the Justice Center is sound, but the interior needs major upgrades. "Most of the systems in the building need to be replaced, from the electrical to the plumbing to the elevator system," he told council members Tuesday. "They have reached the end of their useful life." Sounds like its no longer functional as a JC but I am sure it could be redeveloped with some creativity. This reminds me of the Ameritrust Tower that was proposed to be torn down - I am glad that failed because the redevelopment of that into The 9 has turned out unbelievably good and a real asset for the city. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hts121 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 ^Interesting. I would be in favor of a good gutting of the building, especially the tower. Refitting the jail and police HQs would be the major challenge I would think. ^^Correct, but the entire system would be much, much more efficient if they did not. There should be separate divisions. Civil matters languish at Cuyahoga county because the criminal stuff takes precedence, and civil trials are constantly interrupted and delayed for sentencings, PVs, etc. Separating the dockets would be a smart reform for the betterment of the county and this move would be the perfect time to do that. Of course, many judges would be opposed because they all want to their campaign slogan to read "tough on crime" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cleburger Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 I concede that the JC is not an attractive building but it is a good example of brutalist architecture and although it is not en vogue now, I believe its worth preserving to give character to the skyline and city. It is interesting to walk down the street and see examples of buildings from different era's... this is what gives character to cities. The opposite of character can be said of the new generic Cuyahoga County building which looks like it could belong in a Beachwood office park. Until all the large swaths of vacant lots downtown are redeveloped, we should not tear down a building because nobody likes the style at the moment. As strong as the exterior structure appears to be, I would love to see this redeveloped as apartments, hotel, or whatever else would be the highest and best use. If the county needs a new JC, so be it and the area by the FBI building seems like a perfectly good spot. Agreed, though it's still very sad that these buildings are not maintained for the long-haul. But the bones are still good, so I would support re-purposing. IMO they should build on a warehouse district surface lot---state of the art courts and jail, but keep ground-level retail to not kill the life of the neighborhood. Once completed and moved, the current JC can be renovated into office and/or residential. The jail could be torn down to make some public greenspace at the base of the tower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Urbanophile Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 ^ I'd support re-purposing, but only if someone added additions on the bottom floors, bringing it up to the sidewalks. Sure, the JC is ugly, but I can live with that. The reason I hate it so much is that it completely disregards the urban fabric. If someone can fix that, then by all means, please re-purpose it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJP Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 How about a variation on the West Side Transit Center? This massing has one tower, but if there were two towers (one at the west end for criminal division including the jail, police/deputies offices etc., and the other at the east end for civil division including offices, data processing, archives, etc.) it might offer some benefits. Below all of this you could have a climate-protected bus hub with 24-hour restaurants, newstands and retailers. WSTC massing2 by Ken Prendergast, on Flickr “What is the meaning of this city? Do you huddle close together because you love each other?” Or “We all dwell together to make money from each other”? -- TS Eliot’s The Rock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SixthCity Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 I hope this isn't what Freddy Collier was talking about when he mentioned something "very exciting" for downtown. Got my blood pressure up for nothing. I think this is pretty huge news actually. Meh. Except that we don't even know what/if anything is going to happen. This is literally an announcement that the County is talking about it. Being excited for this is like getting worked up that the Sun is going to burn out eventually. Sure, it will be a calamitous event but we and everyone we know will probably be long dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony battaglia Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 When the new Justice Center is built, the jails should be built underground with the complex built on top. Just an idea of mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freethink Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Well I am happy that discussions are moving forward on this as I posted the first article on this over a 1 year ago. http://www.urbanohio.com/forum2/index.php/topic,3323.msg700350.html#msg700350 I am still trying to wrap my head around the possibilities here. I have always dreamed of the inJustice Ctr coming down. Although if feasible I would be open to a total rehab only if it included a re-cladd of the exterior, something like what is being done to the Celabreeze bldg. But that probably isn't cost effective. My thought is to have the courts downtown and the jail complex away from the city ctr. Available land along the OC would seem to be a good fit for the jail, closer to the Juvenile complex. It would be huge for the Warehouse District if this land became available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoshSteve Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 The jail building on the corner of St Clair and W 3rd is still fairly new. Would it be possible for them to keep the jail building there, and then build on the parking lots across W 3rd? I could see that happening and the current brick building between the lots being merged into a new building like the old Society Bank building is merged into Key Tower. That would keep everything roughly in the same spot downtown, while freeing up the area of the block nearest the Hilton and Medmart. Also we wouldn't have to worry about the ancillary support businesses all jetting off to the opposite side of downtown if it moved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJP Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 I can see portions of the Justice Center being demolished -- the new jail among them. While the tower is visually bland, I got a new appreciation of how tall it is when the Hilton hotel was being built and topped off. Some of the smaller structures that skirt the tower can go away -- like the new jail and anything else that has no street presence. Maybe the jail was built strong enough to be converted into a parking garage?? Or just demolish it for a parking deck over street-level leasable commercial spaces (restaurants, bail bonds, public defender's office) . But you're right. The jail can be anywhere, preferably not in the central business district. Although prisoner moves from jail to court and back again can be a security issue (apart from video arraignments). The courts should not be moved out of downtown. If they did move, so would many law offices and restaurants. 1 “What is the meaning of this city? Do you huddle close together because you love each other?” Or “We all dwell together to make money from each other”? -- TS Eliot’s The Rock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whipjacka Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 They should put it on the opportunity corridor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJP Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 They should put it on the opportunity corridor Why not? The juvenile justice center is over there. Might as well put the adult jail next to it to show the kids what possible future awaits them if they don't clean up their act! “What is the meaning of this city? Do you huddle close together because you love each other?” Or “We all dwell together to make money from each other”? -- TS Eliot’s The Rock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hts121 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 I'd think it is necessary to keep the jails and the criminal division of the courts in same complex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3 Dog Pat Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 Is there room at Tower City, near the Federal courthouse? Also, what is the story with the Cleveland portion of the Justice center, which is municipal courts and the Police Headquarters (right?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cleburger Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 My thought is to have the courts downtown and the jail complex away from the city ctr. Available land along the OC would seem to be a good fit for the jail, closer to the Juvenile complex. It would be huge for the Warehouse District if this land became available. Isn't the point of the complex to have jail and courts connected, so defendants can be marched to and from hearings? Separating the two would cause lots of transport and logistics problems, unless rules now allow for closed-circuit hearings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inlovewithCLE Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 ^Either on the Division of Printing site, or just south of their, somewhere between East 13th and 18th and Lakeside and St. Clair. It would be "out of the way", and still have good access for all the lawyers clustered around East 9th/St. Clair area. I highly doubt they move this out of the CBD. I for one am excited that they will finally get rid of this monstrosity. I understand that by the nature of this it will never be "pedestrian friendly" but I would hope that maybe they would consider a couple of ground floor restaurants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inlovewithCLE Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 When the new Justice Center is built, the jails should be built underground with the complex built on top. Just an idea of mine. Completely agree. Why can't this be done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freethink Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 Is there room at Tower City, near the Federal courthouse? Yes I was thinking about that spot. Remember the old Courthouse Plaza proposal. That would work, courts and jail. Done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJP Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 Don't forget the single tower proposal. I've got a couple of those renderings too. But I don't like this location as county or municipal court as it's a longer walk from most law offices. And it doesn't eradicate a swath of surface parking. A federal court has fewer lawyers who are allowed to represent clients in this venue so its location on the fringes of downtown matters less. “What is the meaning of this city? Do you huddle close together because you love each other?” Or “We all dwell together to make money from each other”? -- TS Eliot’s The Rock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mendo Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 I expect the replacement to be just as pedestrian unfriendly as the current buildings due to safety requirements. Retail along the sidewalk just doesn't seem likely. Raised first floor, set back from the sidewalk, with bollards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJP Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 Location: build on Superior between West 3rd and West 6th. First level (20-foot clearance, except taller glassy "winter garden" atrium at corner of Superior and West 3rd): covered transit center with climate controlled waiting area, 24-hour diner and convenience store. Pedestrian walkway under Superior into Tower City Center rail station. Levels 2-10 multi-story parking garage (all vehicular entrances off Frankfort, except buses which enter/exit from both West 3rd and West 6th mid-block) Levels 11-13 Cleveland Police Division offices Levels 14-15 jury processing, offices, waiting area, cafeteria West Tower levels 15-25: County Civil/domestic/appeals court rooms, judge/magistrate offices + municipal court rooms, judge/magistrate offices, support facilities, etc. East Tower levels 15-39: County criminal court rooms/jury rooms/offices, Cuyahoga County Sherrif's offices, Cuyahoga county jail Or something like that. EDIT: I took the West Side Transit Center massing and made this rough concept out of it, based on the above... Justice Center-Transit Center1s by Ken Prendergast, on Flickr Here's a graphic from the West Side Transit Center study: Westside-transit-center-elevation1 by Ken Prendergast, on Flickr Providing a seamless, more direct pedestrian connection between the rail station at Tower City and a new transit center (gets more buses off Public Square!) plus the overhead uses: West Side Transit Ctr-TCaccess1 by Ken Prendergast, on Flickr More detail on the pedestrian linkage showing an old floor plan of the Terminal Group: West Side Transit Ctr-TCaccess2s by Ken Prendergast, on Flickr “What is the meaning of this city? Do you huddle close together because you love each other?” Or “We all dwell together to make money from each other”? -- TS Eliot’s The Rock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hts121 Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 Does anyone know whether the JC was built on a slab or if they drilled down to bedrock? If the latter, would that make the site more economically feasible for a new tower? They would have to drill the holes again, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLovin Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 I personally think it would be a terrible idea to rebuild a new complex on the same site. Having two jails on the fringe of your up and coming entertainment districts makes sense from an intimidation standpoint but outside of that it just looks bad especially to tourists. When I tell my out of town and state friends here at Kent that Cleveland has two 10 story jails downtown they are taken back. I believe having it on the fringes of downtown or in a less obvious or prominent area would be better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KJP Posted October 1, 2015 Share Posted October 1, 2015 Does anyone know whether the JC was built on a slab or if they drilled down to bedrock? If the latter, would that make the site more economically feasible for a new tower? They would have to drill the holes again, right? I think it was built on caissons because when the Portal public art piece was set outside of it, critics said it looked like someone found a use for a leftover caisson from the building's construction. But since we're talking about a courts building, that's pretty circumstantial evidence. ;) I personally think it would be a terrible idea to rebuild a new complex on the same site. Having two jails on the fringe of your up and coming entertainment districts makes sense from an intimidation standpoint but outside of that it just looks bad especially to tourists. When I tell my out of town and state friends here at Kent that Cleveland has two 10 story jails downtown they are taken back. I believe having it on the fringes of downtown or in a less obvious or prominent area would be better. Does that stop them from coming downtown? I've met folks who didn't even know two of those structures are jails and they had passed by them many times. Putting the jail on the fringe of downtown adds a lot of transportation costs and security issues for moving inmates back-n-forth to the courts. And taking the courts out of the heart of downtown means a lot of law offices, restaurants, etc. will likely leave the heart of downtown too. And they come downtown for work everyday and eat in restaurants downtown more often than you or your friends do, I suspect. “What is the meaning of this city? Do you huddle close together because you love each other?” Or “We all dwell together to make money from each other”? -- TS Eliot’s The Rock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now