Jump to content

gg707

Dirt Lot 0'
  • Content Count

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

13 Good

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yeah, I'd have to think there are some pretty serious limits on overall costs for that area. It's great to see projects like this going up around that area.
  2. The city has been digging up stuff all around that area for a few weeks, so I bet it is just part of that.
  3. I doubt the city would be willing to make that loan because the rest of the project wouldn't pay a prevailing wage. It seems a matter of principle for the city. I find it hard to believe there isn't some other source of a few million dollars of funding for such a large project.
  4. That's a good point. Projects may have to wait, or get started not knowing for certain how many credits will be up for grabs.
  5. Relevant to both this building and Nucleus, SB39 was voted out of committee yesterday and should now be considered by the full senate. Good to see that it is still moving ahead.
  6. I agree. People who think these areas are getting "too hot" or have self-sustaining development need to spend some time in cities that are actually seeing growth. We are just now seeing the benefits of these programs and pulling the cord on them would be seriously short-sighted. The massive amount of new housing being built in the suburbs v. the tiny amount in Cleveland proper pretty clearly depicts how any benefits to building in Cleveland shouldn't be taken away any time soon.
  7. It looks like David Rotenberg from Bixby Bridge Capital, LLC is the buyer. He is listed on the incorporation documents for R&L Ohio City LLC.
  8. There is a lot to like about the scaled back version, and frankly, I just want them to move ahead with some version of the project at this point.
  9. Has the site of the blockchain hub been announced? https://www.crainscleveland.com/technology/blockland-cleveland-tech-hub-close-finding-home If not, that's a possibility.
  10. Interesting -- it seems like there is a good shot it passes this year and less chance of a veto with DeWine.
  11. According to the Ohio legislature website, the transformational mixed-use bill was reintroduced in the Senate last week: https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legislation/legislation-summary?id=GA133-SB-39 I'm not sure if there are differences against the version last year, but it still has the 15-story or 350,000 square feet requirement. Perhaps the large-form Nucleus is not totally off the table if the bill moves forward this year...
  12. Thanks! Didn't realize it had its own thread. Seems like it will eventually be mixed use, but still unplanned.
  13. Does anyone know the plans for the lot in Duck Island on Abbey between 19th and 20th? I saw that it was rezoned to retail, but haven't heard any development plans since.
×
×
  • Create New...